YOUR GUIDE TO THE TWIN CITIES
The Whistleblower blog was started in 2008. Look for posts by these contributors: James Eli Shiffer, Jane Friedmann, and Kelly Smith. | Check out the Whistleblower archive.
Find us on Facebook and Twitter. Find our watchdog and investigative work at The Investigators.
The Star Tribune's journalists need your help blowing the whistle in Minnesota. Contact us here.
resize text 
find us on Facebook
follow on Twitter
subscribe via RSS
Pharmacists disciplined for drug use
Posted by: Jane Friedmann under Whistleblower Updated: February 8, 2012 - 7:12 PM
Guilty plea from former guardian-conservator
Posted by: James Eli Shiffer under Businesses in hot water, Seniors Updated: February 7, 2012 - 3:00 PMLast year I wrote about a former professional guardian and conservator named Terri Ann Hauge, who had lost her license as a lawyer but found a new courthouse career overseeing the lives and finances of vulnerable adults, only to find herself in trouble again. Hauge pleaded guilty last week in Hennepin District Court to felony theft by swindle in connection with the theft of $53,000 from the estate of Foster A. Greene, an Edina man who died in 2003. She is scheduled to be sentenced May 21. Her co-defendant, Terrance Larpenteur, is scheduled to appear in court for a plea hearing March 30.
Hauge and Larpenteur ran Estate Resources, Inc., which at one time handled one of the state's largest portfolios of work as guardians and conservators. Hauge still faces numerous charges of theft by swindle, financial exploitation of an elderly adult and perjury in Rice County.
Wrong click costs him plenty
Posted by: Kelly Smith under Problems on the job Updated: February 7, 2012 - 12:33 PMIn case you missed Sunday's Whistleblower column, here it is. To join the conversation, go to the original article to comment.
In November, Paul Thielen applied for unemployment benefits after he stopped working at a St. Cloud printing plant. He thought he was getting laid off. His company told the state the same thing, records show. But an unemployment law judge denied Thielen's request, saying he was on a leave of absence and isn't eligible for benefits.
That's left Thielen, 51, of Paynesville, without an estimated $1,500 for five weeks out of a job. Now he's fighting the decision as he tries to make ends meet supporting his 13-year-old daughter, who is developmentally disabled and requires frequent medical appointments.
Thielen acknowledges that he made a mistake when first applying for benefits -- by clicking the button that said "leave of absence" instead of "layoff." But he doesn't understand why his appeal, supported by his company, has gotten nowhere.
"It's very frustrating," he said. "You have to wonder how many other Minnesotans are having this problem."
The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development declined to comment on the pending case. But in the Jan. 27 decision on Thielen's appeal, unemployment law judge Christopher Cimafranca said that a "preponderance of the evidence shows Thielen was on a voluntary leave of absence," and is therefore not eligible for unemployment benefits.
David Allen Larson, a law professor at Hamline University who specializes in employment law, said it's unusual for the state to deny benefits when the employee and employer both support a request. "Ordinarily, an employer wouldn't join a claim," Larson said.
"It just comes down to a different determination of what really happened here," he said. "Was this really a layoff? The judge was saying 'I don't buy it.' There must have been something that caused them to believe this is not a straight layoff."
A 30-year printing worker, Thielen had worked at Nahan Printing as a roll tender for a year and a half when he was told in November the company needed to reduce its workforce. He was told he could work part-time and get unemployment for the hours he was no longer able to work, or he could accept a straight layoff. He said he chose the latter, because of the challenge of arranging child care on that part-time schedule.
The problem started when Thielen filed for unemployment insurance benefits online. Days later, he was told an issue was pending. That's when he said he realized he had reported the loss of job was due to a "leave of absence" not "layoff."
"It's a simple fact I made a mistake," he said. "I clicked the wrong button."
Nahan Printing declined to comment on Thielen's case, citing employee privacy, but in a report in December the company confirmed that Thielen was laid off due to lack of work. Thielen said that seven of his co-workers who also chose the layoff over part-time work are receiving benefits.
Yet in his ruling, Cimafranca wrote that Thielen could have chosen to work part-time, so therefore he wasn't laid off. Even those on a leave of absence can be eligible for benefits, but not in Thielen's case because Nahan Printing doesn't have a written policy about it, the judge wrote.
Thielen has now filed a request for reconsideration and is waiting for a response from another unemployment law judge later this month.
If he's denied again, his next option is to file an appeal with the Minnesota Court of Appeals. As he awaits a decision, Thielen has returned to work twice for short stints.
"That's the purpose of it -- a bridge to help people between jobs," he said about the unemployment benefit. "I've got my back up against a wall. Does it really need to be this complicated?"
Debt settler to pay restitution, fine
Posted by: Jane Friedmann under Businesses in hot water, Buyer beware, Whistleblower Updated: February 7, 2012 - 9:38 AMADVERTISEMENT
recent posts
- Pharmacists disciplined for drug use
- Guilty plea from former guardian-conservator
- Wrong click costs him plenty
- Debt settler to pay restitution, fine
- Commerce department warns of fraudulent investments
- License is suspended after teen buys smokes
- Ruling: nurse can't work with patients
- A new Whistleblower on the beat
- Scammers claim to be with the BBB
- Unlicensed mortgage agent is fined, banned
- Attorney disbarred for ‘severe misconduct’
- Diet pill peddler to pay $1.5 million
- Who pays when shopping carts stray?
- BBB gives retailer a failing grade
- Grumpy Goat cheese recalled
- BBB: Company can't offer interment in Nat'l cemetery
- Preston ambulance cited for low staffing
Post By Category
ADVERTISEMENT
inside the StarTribune
-
425 Portland Av. S.
Minneapolis, MN 55488
(612) 673-4000
- Company
- Subscriber Services
- Website
- Buy Ads
- Store
- Connect with Us
© 2012 StarTribune. All rights reserved.
StarTribune.com is powered by Limelight Networks
Newspaper Subscriptions
eEdition
RSS
Newsletters