Patrick Reusse Logo


Patrick Reusse

Patrick Reusse has been covering sports in the Twin Cities since 1968.

Reusse: Champions vs. PGA Tour events? Start with money and keep going

What’s the difference between the commitment required for sponsorship and operation of a weekly, 54-hole tournament on the Champions Tour, and a weekly, 72-hole tournament on the PGA Tour?

You can start with this: The final 3M Championship as a Champions event will be held the week of July 30-Aug. 5 and have a purse of $1.75 million. The first 3M Open as a PGA Tour event will be held next summer and will have an estimated purse of $6.6 million.

There are generally 84 players in a Champions event. There are 156 players in a weekly PGA Tour event.

The TPC Twin Cities will set up at around 7,000 yards for the seniors in early August. Construction of new tee boxes will start shortly after the tournament ends, allowing the PGA Tour event in 2019 to be played at 7,600 yards, if desired.

The fairways will be narrowed by allowing a rough to grow and there will be trees added to some of those wide-open spaces. Any changes to greens will come later.

There will be low scores at the 3M Open in 2019, but not purposely so as has been the case for the Champions event. Barring rain, the greens will be faster, and the pins will be more difficult.

Hollis Cavner, the executive director of the 3M Championship said: “The Tour will put some teeth in this golf course, to make it a fair challenge for the players.’’

Tom Lehman will be involved in the changes to the course. The orginal designer of the TPC Twin Cities was Arnold Palmer, with consulting work by Lehman.

The mom-and-pop attraction that has been the 3M Champions event is going away. Forget about the free admission of recent years. You won’t be paying through the eyeballs, as at a Ryder Cup, but there will be normal PGA Tour prices for daily tickets or week-long passes.

Cavner was at Shinnecock Hills last week. The word already was out with players that Minnesota would be on the PGA Tour calendar. Cavner said he talked with numerous players and received encouragement that a fair number of top 30-type players would be here for the Twin Cities’ first weekly stop on the PGA Tour since 1969.

The expectation is that the 3M Open will be played the week of July 1-7 in 2019, moving into the slot currently occupied by the Greenbrier event in West Virginia. The Greenbrier is moving to the fall and the start of the 2019-2020 wraparound season next year.

The Fourth of July week has been deemed as a tough sell for players. Even more importantly, a 3M Open that week would be competing with the we’re-going-to-the-lake masses in the Twin Cities.

“We’ve done some surveys,’’ Cavner said. “There are a huge number of people in the Twin Cities over the Fourth. We’re going to give them an entertaining event. Among other things, we’re going to have a notable concert, probably on Friday night.’’

Cavner is the CEO of Pro Links Sports. His management team took over the struggling Tampa event a few years ago and has turned it into a winner with the Valspar Championship. Pro Links takes care of the sponsors for the World Golf event in Mexico City, and managed the Wells Fargo event in Charlotte this year.

Pro Links has Champions events in Houston, Boca Raton, Fla. and the first Sanford-sponsored event in Sioux Falls, S.D. thiis September.

The challenge for making the 3M Open an immediate success as a PGA Tour event in 2019 faces more competition than Minnesotans heading to the lake for the Fourth.

The 2019 KPMG Women’s PGA will be held two weeks earlier – June 20-23 – at Hazeltine. It’s part of the PGA of America’s connection with Hazeltine that now includes the return of the Ryder Cup in 2028.

“Hazeltine gets great support for its events,’’ Cavner said. “So do we. 3M has a seven-year contract with the Tour. We're dealing with longer agreements with sponsors than Hazeltine is with the Women’s PGA. The way I see things, 2019 is going to be a great summer for golf fans in Minnesota.’’

Reusse: Where's Wolves-style vitriol for the underwhelming Twins?

The Twins completed the longest homestand of the season, 11 games, on Sunday, and went  6-5 against Cleveland (3-1), the White Sox (2-2) and the Angels (1-2). This put them at 28-34 and, for non-mathematicians, that leaves Paul Molitor’s club with 100 games to rescue a season that largely has been excitement-free.

Considering the magnitude of this 10 ½-week failure, I’ve been surprised at the modest amount of angst directed at the Twins from the local sporting public. Indifference seems to be far more in vogue that vitriol.

Part of that can be traced to baseball’s ongoing decline with the population in general. For sure, the craft beer-and-food truck crowd finds baseball to be the Sad Old Game, and those consumers are lost forever (or the next World Series in Minnesota, which might be the same thing).

They are not alone. I hear “baseball is boring’’ much more than I hear “the Twins are lousy’’ when out amongst ‘em.

I’ve found this to be quite a contrast to the recent Timberwolves season, where large numbers of fans – meaning, those with a general interest in Minnesota sports – would inform me of their complaints over our NBA team.

It was neck-and-neck as to whether they were more unhappy with coach Tom Thibodeau or the young, faded star, Andrew Wiggins, but they were unhappy to be sure.

The Timberwolves improved by 16 wins, to 47-35, and reached the playoffs for the first time since 2004, and the reaction received in public postings and a fair share of Twin Cities media outlets bordered on the hostile.

Charles Barkley and Chris Webber were also over-the-top in their bashing of Thibodeau and the Wolves. Chuck declared them to be the “dumbest team in basketball,’’ although I think he offered that label to other units as the NBA playoffs worked their way to the inevitable Warriors’ championship.

The Twins aren’t getting much of that, maybe because the NBA is the “in’’ league with social media wizards and national sports commentators, and baseball is out.

Bottom line: I feel as though the 2018 Twins are being shortchanged in criticism.

First off, if you want to rip Wiggins for failing to come close to a satisfactory level of performance … well, the Twins have a pair of Wiggins’: Miguel Sano and Byron Buxton.

There was an indication of pending greatness for Sano after his arrival on July 2, 2015 as a rookie. Three seasons later, Sano is mired in futility that threatens to make him the biggest bust in Minnesota’s nearly six decades as an official major league sports market.

We’re talking about biggest in expectations, and not any other area, so keep those jokes to yourselves.

Any such list would not be a competition of high draft choices that flopped for the Twins, Vikings, Timberwolves, etc. This would be players that received a phenomenal buildup, showed ability, and drifted into mediocrity while still young.

Christian Laettner comes to mind; decent numbers, no positive impact on the franchise. Charlie Coyle is threatening to be a different sort of a flop; a hockey player people thought would become extra-good, not great, and is now perceived as on the trade market while in his mid-20s.

It’s a short list – all-time flops – that were greeted with the anticipation of Sano. Miguel isn’t official yet, and he doesn’t have to wind up there, but he’s on the watch list … along with Buxton and Wiggins.

There’s one large difference with Wiggins: He plays. The Timberwolves have played 333 games in his four seasons and he has played 332.

Sano has missed a bunch. So has Buxton, now on the disabled list with his .156 batting average.

Sano has a natural hitting ability that he is not close to tapping because of his wild, overamped swing. If he ever chooses to start staying on a breaking ball and bashing it to right-field gap, there is still hope.

Buxton has a tougher task of being on time with his multi-part swing, and with the game being taken over by the increased velocity from pitchers in general -- a future of solid hitting numbers seems increasingly iffy.

David Schoenfield had a piece on last week under the headline, “10 hyped players who are running out of time to become stars.’’

Sano and Buxton were second and third on that list.

For five years, they were going to be the combination – power and speed – to put the excitement back in the Sad Old Game for baseball absentees. Instead, they have become a major reason to continue ignoring the Twins completely.

For audience building, that’s worse than the non-stop complaints aimed at Thibs and Wiggy.