Paul Douglas is a nationally respected meteorologist with 33 years of television and radio experience. A serial entrepreneur, Douglas is Senior Meteorologist for WeatherNation TV, a new, national 24/7 weather channel with studios in Denver and Minneapolis. Founder of Media Logic Group, Douglas and a team of meteorologists provide weather services for media at Broadcast Weather, and high-tech alerting and briefing services for companies via Alerts Broadcaster. His speaking engagements take him around the Midwest with a message of continuous experimentation and reinvention, no matter what business you’re in. He is the public face of “SAVE”, Suicide Awareness, Voices of Education, based in Bloomington. | Send Paul a question.

Polar Shrinkage (40s on the way - tracking wind chill warnings as one measure of winter severity)

Posted by: Paul Douglas under Lions Updated: March 5, 2014 - 9:23 AM

The view out my window looks like the opening credits in the movie "Fargo". I have a pet glacier in my back yard. When I tell my dog (Leo) to go outside and do his business I swear he shakes his head no. "You kidding me?"

It's so cold I can barely stand the four minutes I'm outdoors every day.

But hope springs eternal. Today the sun is as high in the sky as it was on October 6. Daylight is almost 2 hours and 40 minutes longer than it was on December 21. Daylight saving time kicks off early Sunday morning! Warm air can't push cold air out of the way. The Polar Vortex has to retreat on its own, a process that will happen slowly, incrementally, during March.

Breaking news: not one subzero low in sight. That's progress. Last night's clipper may slow down your morning commute, but I expect good travel weather into Monday, as winds aloft swing to the west, allowing a precious puff of Pacific air to waft into Minnesota. A thaw is likely Friday, again early next week. ECMWF guidance hints at highs near 40F Sunday and Monday. We'll see more relapses of cold air this month (count on it), but probably nothing polar.

NOAA's CFS 45 day trend shows 60s the second week of April closer to the Twin Cities. What can possibly go wrong?

Trust me, I'm a weatherman.

* image above courtesy of Climate Reanalyzer at the University of Maine.


Snowfall Tuesday Night. A few flurries fell in the metro, but the latest clipper tracked well south of MSP, dropping a 3-6" carpet of new snow over far southern Minnesota, as much as 10" reported south of Mankato. Details via NOAA.


Slow Thaw. The latest (12z) ECMWF guidance is trending warmer than previous runs for next week; highs may top 40 Sunday, Monday and Wednesday. It may actually feel like March out there - no major storms brewing just yet. Graphic: Weatherspark.


Long Overdue Shift In The Jet Stream. Winds at 250 mb, where the core of the jet stream blows, become more zonal, west to east, early next week, pushing milder, Pacific air across the USA, a blessed hint of spring to come. Map: Climate Reanalyzer.


Cheering For The Solid Red Line. Because that red line is the 32F isotherm, pushing into Minnesota by Friday. The February-like airmass gripping much of America east of the Rockies will slowly relax its stranghold in the coming days. 2-meter NAM temperatures courtesy of NOAA and Ham Weather.



Feeling Better About March. GFS data from NOAA shows more 30s and a few 40s into the third week of March - no subzero relapses in sight, although I wouldn't rule out at least one more night of negative numbers. No cause for noisy celebration (yet), but at least we can all exhale. No more cringe-worthy cold fronts are looming on the horizon.


In Search Of Perspective. We all know it's been a tough winter for much of the USA, but does it really compare with the (savage) winters of the 70s and early 80s? One measure is the number of winter days with a windchill below -35F, dangerous enough for NOAA to issue Windchill Warnings. We had 5 of those this winter. In the 70s and 80s we had a few winters with as many as 10-12 days of Windchill Warnings. 9th coldest meteorological winter for MSP; 50 subzero nights, but no record lows, very few thaws to speak of for 3 straight months. There are other measures, of course: ice on the Great Lakes, the amount of snow that falls, and from Chicago to Detroit locals may be even more sick of winter than we are in Minnesota. That's the subject of today's Climate Matters: "WeatherNation Chief Meteorologist Paul Douglas goes over some of the record breaking cold and snow stats from the previous 3 months, which are statistically the coldest months of the year. All time record lows broken... in March? Par for the course the way this winter has been. But in the grand scheme of things, we have seen worse. And folks out west are wondering what all the fuss is about as Alaska saw its 15th warmest winter and Las Vegas saw its warmest winter ever!"


Updated Snowfall Totals. O.K. It's really an eye test. Click here to get a better view via NOAA and Facebook. Highlights: "Here is an updated listing of seasonal snowfall totals across the Eastern US. Toledo, Ohio has already broken their seasonal snowfall record. Toledo has received 76.5" of snow thus far, breaking the previous record of 73.1" in 1977-78."

Other locations are currently in the top 5 snowiest winters are: 


Allentown PA (3rd) - record 75.2" in 1993-94
Cincinnati OH (3rd) - record 53.9" in 1977-78
Columbus OH (4th) - record 67.8" in 1909-10
Dayton OH (4th) - record 62.7" in 1977-78
New Bern NC (4th) - record 19.1" in 1972-73
NYC-LaGuardia NY (4th) - record 77.9" in 1995-96
Philadelphia PA (2nd) - record 78.7" in 2009-10
Wilmington DE (2nd) - record 72.7" in 2009-10


Ask Paul. Weather-related questions, comments (and threats):

"Paul - since I live in the "feels like" weather (and not the actual air temp), I am wondering how many days has the "feels like temp" been below zero? Or maybe easier for you to count, the number of 24 hour periods when the "feels like temp" has been zero? Real temps do not count except for the record books."

- Angela Newfield

Angela - your point is a good one, but NOAA and the local Climate Office don't track the number of subzero windchill days during a given winter. What they do keep tabs on are the coldest wind chills for each winter dating back to 1906, and the number of Windchill Advisories (-25 WC or colder) and Windchill Warnings (-35 WC or colder) issued from winter to winter. Pete Boulay at the Minnesota Climatology Working Group passed along a link which made me do a double-take. His comment: "Bottom line is that there have been worse winters!" Indeed.


Coldest Windchill Temperature Of The Winter. It's true the windchill formula was revised around 2001, but the trend in recent winters is for fewer (severe) wind chill readings from winter to winter. Our coldest wind chill at MSP to date this winter: -48F. The 60s, 70s and 80s saw wind chills dipping into the -50 to -57F range, as cold as -63F during the winter of 1936. Graphic: Minnesota Climatology Working Group.


Number of Windchill Advisories Issued Each Winter at MSP. So far it looks like 18 days with Windchill Advisories this winter in the Twin Cities. From the 60s thru the 80s we tended to see more advisories for a windchill of -25F or colder.


Winter Days With Windchill Warnings In The Twin Cities. So far this winter we've enjoyed/endured 5 days with Windchill Warnings, issued by NOAA when the chill factor is expected to dip to -35F or lower. We saw far more dangerously cold days (combination of temperature and wind) in the 60s, 70s and early 80s. Not to minimize the pain this winter, but Pete is right - we have seen worse.

An Apples to Oranges Comparison? Here's an e-mail that came in Wednesday morning that made me question the results above. Dean has a point:

"In Paul Douglas’ comparison of annual wind chill warnings, were the historical numbers the actual numbers issued by NOAA? If so, this is an apples/oranges comparison because of the change in the wind chill index about 15 years ago. The current wind chill formula does not generate as low of wind chill values especially for the really low values that would generate a wind chill warning.

If the historic NOAA wind chill data would be used in the current wind chill formula, there would be less (probably far less) wind chill warning for the 1960s and 1970s. The current winter would probably be as bad, in terms of wind chill warnings, as those decades."

- Dean Anderson


Silent Spring. Old Man Winter is hanging on for dear life, you can see his snowy scratch-marks as far south as Texas and Arkansas, where snow on the ground in early March is rare, but not unprecedented. As of yesterday NOAA reports snow on the ground over 53.9% of the lower 48 states. That's down from 61.2% of the USA on February 4.



Why Snowstorms Are More Devastating Now To American Cities. An inch of snow in the 60s? No big deal. Our parents called this "flurries". Today an inch of snow falling at the wrong time and wrong temperature can bring a city's transporation grid to a halt. What has changed? Here's an excerpt of an interesting story at NBC Philadelphia: "Snowstorms have become devastating to American cities -- thanks to a commonplace technology: the private automobile. "The evil snow is upon us.” So wrote New York lawyer and diarist George Templeton Strong in December 1879, describing a storm that had paralyzed the city. Teams of horses pulled ploughs through the snow, piled high along the sidewalks; downed electrical lines pitched the streets into darkness. In the future, Strong imagined, things would be better. “A century hence cities will be put under glass,” he predicted, “and New York will be enclosed in a huge crystal palace...”

Photo credit above: "Slippery West Sedgwick Street in Northwest Philadelphia afer a recent storm." Bas Slabbers - NewsWorks.org.


Ice-Covered Lakes May Be Bottling Arctic Cold For Spring. Chicago has had a very memorable winter: 3rd coldest meteorological winter with 74" snow, more than 43" above average, to date. They've experienced 2 winters in the Windy City! Here's a recent video and excerpt from The Chicago Tribune: "With March just days away, Chicagoans can’t be blamed for looking forward to the disappearance of the polar vortex. But be warned: with the Great Lakes more ice-covered than they have been in decades, the latest blast of arctic chill is being bottled for spring. The early descent of this season’s chill forced the Coast Guard to start its ice-breaking ships sooner than any time  in recent memory and raises the prospect that all that frozen water will slow any hint of a spring warmup..."



A World Of Water, Seen From Space. Here's an excerpt of a good description of the latest NASA satellite to be launched into low orbit to study Earth's water supply, courtesy of The Atlantic and Yahoo Finance: "...NASA calls this latest satellite the Global Precipitation Measurement Core Observatory. I propose we call it, to make things simpler for ourselves, "Core." Core is, technically, a weather satellite, built to observe the workings of the Earth from beyond its bounds. But it's more complex than a traditional satellite: Core gets its name from the fact that it is the central unit in a network of nine satellites studded across the exterior perimeter of the Earth, contributed to the cause by various countries and space agenices. Their job? To analyze the planet's water, from beyond the planet..."

Image credit above: "The GPM Core satellite launches from Japan on Thursday, February 27." (NASA).


Storm-Tracking NOAA Satellite System Gets A Technology Boost. CNET describes how these new Earth platforms may improve storm predictions by providing higher-resolution data streams into the models we use on a daily basis; here's a clip: "A three-satellite storm-tracking system run by the U.S. government is getting some updates that will support a complete technological refresh. Raytheon said today that it has booked $185 million in new business for the Joint Polar Satellite System's Common Ground System. The JPSS, a collaborative system between the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA, is a polar-orbiting environmental system designed to both track storms and other weather events and take and send back to Earth imagery showing changes in the planet's environment over time..."

Image credit above: "One of the three Joint Polar Satellite Systems satellites." (Credit: NOAA/NASA).


New Hurricane Model Can More Accurately Predict Hurricane Path, Intensity. redOrbit has an interesting story - here's the introduction: "...In addition to incorporating real-time Doppler radar information, the convection-permitting hurricane analysis and forecasting system (WRF-EnKF) also uses high-resolution cloud-permitting grids, which allow for the consideration of individual clouds in modeling a storm system. "Our model predicted storm paths with 100 km - 50 mile - accuracy four to five days ahead of landfall for Hurricane Sandy," Zhang said. "We also had accurate predictions of Sandy's intensity..."

Image credit above: "Superstorm Sandy as it slams the Northeast in October 2012." Credit: NOAA/NASA.


Oklahoma Congressman's Proposal Would Extend Lead Time For Tornado Warnings. A 45-60 minute lead time for tornadoes? It's not as far-fetched as it sounds. But it brings up an interesting dilemma: can you provide too warning? If I have an hour's notice I might be tempted to run home, or pick up the kids at school - instead of heading to the basement. Here's an excerpt from Insurance Journal: "An Oklahoma congressman has proposed legislation that would make the protection of people and property a priority for federal weather forecasters and extend the lead time for tornado warnings. Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner John D. Doak has expressed his support for the Weather Forecasting Improvement Act (H.R. 2413), sponsored by Congressman Jim Bridenstine (R-Oklahoma), which would establish the Tornado Warning Extension Program. The resolution is aimed at funding a research program within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to extend the lead time for tornado warnings beyond one hour..."

When Hurricane Sandy slammed into southern New Jersey in October 2012, it had essentially confounded both the NOAA‘s Global Forecast System (GFS) and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF).

Now, a new real-time hurricane analysis system being developed at Penn State University has been shown to accurately predict the track and intensity of the deadly storm.

“For this particular study aircraft-based Doppler radar information was ingested into the system,” said Fuqing Zhang, a professor of meteorology at Penn State. “Our predictions were comparable to or better than those made by operational global models.”


Read more at http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1113081033/hurricane-model-accurately-predict-storm-path-intensity-022614/#ezvDvxMucTOvdtR6.99Oklahoma Congressman's Proposal Would Extend Lead Time For Tornado Warnings. A 45-60 minute lead time for tornadoes? It's not as far-fetched as it sounds. But it brings up an interesting dilemma: can you provide too warning? If I have an hour's notice I might be tempted to run home, or pick up the kids at school - instead of heading to the basement. Here's an excerpt from Insurance Journal: "An Oklahoma congressman has proposed legislation that would make the protection of people and property a priority for federal weather forecasters and extend the lead time for tornado warnings. Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner John D. Doak has expressed his support for the Weather Forecasting Improvement Act (H.R. 2413), sponsored by Congressman Jim Bridenstine (R-Oklahoma), which would establish the Tornado Warning Extension Program. The resolution is aimed at funding a research program within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to extend the lead time for tornado warnings beyond one hour..."

Reality Check: The Tornado "False Alarm" Problem. The last I checked 70% of tornado warnings were false alarms, nationwide. It's always better to err on the side of safety, caution and protecting human life, but too many false alarms and the public can be apathetic. "They're crying wolf again - just ignore the sirens". Here's a video clip and excerpt from a story at fox19.com: "It has been a crazy winter, filled with snow and bitter cold. Mother nature trumped the winter weather on Thursday with the first severe weather episode of 2014. The National Weather Service issued five tornado alerts. Only three weak funnels appeared -three out of five with a false alarm rate of 40 percent. Why does the Tornado Warning policy treat weak, spin-up funnels the same as it does monstrous killer tornadoes? The policy is set at high levels in the National Weather Service bureaucracy. The system needs to be fixed..."


Tornado And Severe Storm Watches Issued In 2013. Last year was relatively quiet, especially for tornadoes, with a few notable exceptions (around Oklahoma City). The upper left graphic shows the total number of tornado watches, the lower left depicts departure from the 20 year averages - showing a slight increase in tornado watches over the Middle Mississippi Valley and Mid Atlantic. The column on the right shows total number of severe storm watches (upper left), and departure from average, with a more significant spike in severe storm watches for the Plains. Source: NOAA SPC.


Researcher Finds Possible Clue To Some Tornadoes' Paths. The Wichita Eagle has the story; here's an excerpt at kansas.com: "Tornado Alley weather officials say they’ll be watching supercell thunderstorms closely this year for a potential clue indicating a potential tornado’s path. That clue lies in the speed of winds at the middle levels of the atmosphere. If some preliminary data is confirmed by additional research, meteorologists may be able to more readily convince people near but not in a tornado’s expected path to take shelter..."


The Future Of Severe Weather Forecasting. Here's a video and excerpt from News 9 Chief Meteorologist David Payne in Oklahoma City on NewsOn6.com: "...He said he's never seen so many intense tornadoes in such a short period of time as we saw in May 2013.  He adds we took something good from the outbreak, new data models that will help us better predict future storms. "These are models that can actually model individual storms and they're going to come up with an ensemble of forecasts of varying initial conditions," Bluestein said. "You may be able to assign, a better probability that yes, the next day there will be storms. Of those storms, there will be a certain chain that there will be tornadoes..."


The Impact Of Disregarding Weather Related Risk. Here's an excerpt of an article at seekingalpha.com that caught my eye: "...Recent events have emphasized the need for an all-encompassing, easily implementable risk management plan, especially with respect to weather related risk. Though often overlooked by many companies and governing leaders, weather related crises are a primary risk to many organizations, as these incidents have the potential to significantly and unexpectedly impact operations, supply chains, and customer demands..."


Your Joints, Pain And The Weather. All those things your grandmother taught you are true. Our bodies are (mostly) water - why wouldn't we respond to pain sparked by continuous fluctuations in atmospheric pressure, temperature and moisture? Here's a clip from an article at Grandparents.com. What, you don't troll this site? "...Several medical studies—although not all—back up these suspicions. As early as the 1960s, a University of Pennsylvania physician put people with arthritis into a weather chamber and found that falling barometric pressure and increased humidity increased the perception of pain. In 2007, Tufts researchers studied 200 people with knee arthritis and found that both barometric pressure and cold affected pain. In January of 2014, Dutch researchers found that in people with severe hip arthritis, barometric pressure and humidity had a modest effect on pain perception. (Weather can have other painful effects, too: There’s evidence that lightning can trigger migraine headaches, for example.)..."



Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2014/03/03/3321809/researcher-finds-possible-clue.html#storylink=cpy

Play With Earth's Beautiful Weather Systems In Your Browser. They look beautiful, almost poetic from 22,300 miles above the ground. Here at ground level? Not so much. Here's a clip from a story at geek.com: "With a program called Natural Earth, programmer Cameron Beccario has created a beautiful, real-time model of Earth’s wind and ocean dynamics. Though it’s fed with some of the most accurate and up-to-date information we have, most people probably won’t be using it as an educational or scientific tool; rather, they will marvel at its aesthetic beauty, and fiddle with the included controls to see various aspects of the weather over their home country. Check out the map and be sure to click on the ‘Earth’ logo at the bottom left for access to the surprisingly robust rendering controls..."


Apple's New CarPlay System Will Turn Tens Of Millions Of Cars Into iPhone Accessories. TechCrunch has a good overview of how (soon) you may be able to tap into apps and music and safely (?) respond to texts in your favorite vehicle; here's the intro: "Apple’s newly announced CarPlay, which is the rebranded version of iOS in the Car, a system for converting your vehicle’s in-car entertainment system into an iOS-powered dashboard fed content and brains by your phone, is a play that could massively expand the Apple mobile ecosystem – by turning cars into app-enabled iPhone accessories. The CarPlay system was revealed today during the Geneva Motor Show, where partners Ferrari, Mercedes-Benz and Volvo all announced that they’d begin shipping CarPlay-enabled vehicles to drivers this week..."


19 F. high in the Twin Cities Tuesday.

35 F. average high on March 4.

29 F. high on March 4, 2013.

19" snow on the ground.


TODAY: Blue sky, feeling a little better out there. Winds: East 10. High: 25

WEDNESDAY NIGHT: Partly cloudy. Low: 12

THURSDAY: Breezy and milder with peeks of sun. High: 30

FRIDAY: More clouds than sun. Tolerable. Wake-up: 26. High: 34

SATURDAY: Partly sunny, slightly cooler. Wake-up: 13. High: 28

SUNDAY: Some sun. Grilling weather. Wake-up: 15. High: 40

MONDAY: Slushy mess, but who cares? Wake-up: 28. High: 44

TUESDAY: Cooler with intervals of sun. Wake-up: 24. High: 36

* Photo above courtesy of Neil Weaver at neilweaverphotography.com.


Climate Stories....

Energy CEO: Climate Change Is Real, Driven By Humans. I almost fell off the Doppler after reading this story at fuelfix.com; here's an excerpt: "BHP Billiton CEO Andrew Mackenzie, who leads the world’s largest mining company, said Tuesday that climate change is real and driven by human activity. Speaking to energy industry leaders at the CERAWeek conference in Houston, Mackenzie, a geologist by training, said evidence of the climate trend is clear and compelling. “You can’t argue with a rock,” Mackenzie said, noting geological signs of the change. Mackenzie — whose Australia-based company produces oil, gas, coal and uranium — also advocated for the creation of a carbon pricing system that would enable the market “to identify the most cost-effective methods of cutting emissions...”

Photo credit above: "BHP Billiton CEO Andrew Mackenzie speaks at the IHS CERAWeek energy conference in Houston on March 4, 2014." (Mayra Beltran/Houston Chronicle).


The Defense Department Takes Climate Change Seriously. The Navy is concerned about projecting power in a rapidly melting Arctic, and implications of higher sea levels on their major ports of Norfolk and San Diego. The 88 page PDF of The Department of Defense Quadrennial Defense Review 2014 is here. Navy Admiral David Titley (retired) writes: "For all the defense policy geeks ... DoD released today the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review -- climate change and its impacts to national security highlighted throughout. About as good as it gets from a high level policy document."

* more details on the implications of rising seas and increased climate volatility on the military at The Center for Climate & Security.


Climate Study: Rising Seas Could Wipe Out Many Cultural Landmarks. LiveScience has the story - here's a clip: "...Sea-level rise has been a key concern for climate scientists, but making precise projections of how much, and how fast, sea levels may rise remains tricky. As water heats up, it expands and takes up more space, which causes sea levels to rise. Furthermore, rising surface temperatures trigger melting ice, particularly in the sprawling ice sheets that cover Greenland and Antarctica. It is difficult to make accurate predictions of how much sea levels may rise, but Marzeion said it is generally thought that for every 5.4 degrees F of warming, sea levels could rise nearly 23 feet (7 meters)..."


Global Warming Slows Down Antarctica's Coldest Currents. Scientific American has the article - here's the introduction: "A shift from briny to fresh in Antarctica's ocean waters in recent decades could explain the shutdown of the Southern Ocean's coldest, deepest currents, a new study finds. The cold currents, called the Antarctic Bottom Water, are chilly, salty rivers that flow from the underwater edge of the Antarctic continent north toward the equator, keeping to the bottom of the seafloor. The currents carry oxygen, carbon and nutrients down to the deepest parts of the ocean. Previous studies have found this deep, dense water is disappearing, though researchers aren't sure if the shrinkage is part of a long-term trend linked to global warming, or a natural cycle..."

Photo credit: "Icebergs and sea ice floating atop near-freezing surface waters of the Weddell Sea." Courtesy of Eric Galbraith.


Cartoon: The Climate Contrarian Guide To Managing Risk. Maybe if we ignore it - it'll go away? If we managed the rest of our lives the way some want to "manage" climate change and increased weather volatility, we'd be accused of taking leave of our senses. Here's an excerpt from The Guardian: "...When it comes to managing risk, uncertainty is not our friend. Uncertainty means it's possible the outcome will be better than we expect, but it's also possible it will be much worse than we expect. In fact, continuing with business-as-usual would only be a reasonable option in the absolute best case scenario. Doing nothing is betting the farm on a very low probability scenario.  It's an incredibly high-risk path that fails to reduce the threats posed by the worst case or even most likely case scenarios..."

Cartoon credit above: "The climate contrarian guide to managing risk." Created by John Cook.

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT