Extended warranties: Value is a matter of personal choice

  • Article by: PAUL BRAND
  • Updated: November 2, 2012 - 4:02 PM
Q I would like to comment on your recent column on whether it is worthwhile to buy an extended warranty for a car. Extended warranties are provided by companies that need to earn a profit. In order to do this, they have to collect more money from their customers than they pay out. It is possible for a car owner to benefit from buying an extended warranty, but most people pay out more than they get back. Otherwise, the company providing the warranty won't stay in business. When I buy a car, computer or home appliance, I always decline the extended warranty. If something breaks after the warranty period, I pay for the repair with money I've saved by not buying any extended warranties, and I come out ahead. With regard to deductibles, I used to pay for low deductibles on car and house insurance. After a while I realized this was not the best option and I switched to higher deductibles. If I have to make an insurance claim, I will pay the higher deductible with money I save on insurance premiums, and I come out ahead. The same principle applies to the deductible on an extended warranty, which is another form of insurance.

A I received a number of letters and e-mails commenting on my column regarding my change in position on extended warranties and service contracts. It described how now, after nearly 30 years as a "car guy," I believe in the value of purchasing an extended warranty or service contract on a new or late-model vehicle that you're going to keep for long beyond the original manufacturer's warranty expires.

I agree with the above car owner in terms of extended warranties and service contracts on appliances, home electronics and other relatively low-cost purchases. But with modern vehicles costing hundreds, even thousands of dollars to repair, I disagree.

I certainly respect the position but want to point out that, while liability coverage, and in some states personal injury protection, is mandated by law, insurance for your own vehicle is not. Thus, choosing collision and comprehensive coverage is very much akin to purchasing an extended warranty or service contract.

I choose to carry collision and comprehensive coverage on my newer vehicles. With repair and replacement costs potentially in the tens of thousands of dollars, I can't see operating them with no coverage for a loss from a crash, fire, theft or vandalism.

Ditto health insurance. It's difficult to imagine the consequences of having no coverage for a significant health issue.

I feel the same way about potential mechanical and electronic failures. Labor and replacement parts for major repairs can easily run into the hundreds or thousands of dollars. Most of us worry about engine or transmission failures as a major expense, but systems such as climate control, electronic steering, anti-lock braking system and traction control, and other sophisticated systems can cost just as much to repair or replace.

The question of deductibles is valid. I, too, carry high deductibles for collision and comprehensive coverage (and health insurance) for the basic reason that I don't expect to make claims very often. But I recognize that repairs from mechanical and electronic failures, and wear and tear over the 10-plus years I keep my vehicles, are virtually inevitable. Thus, I want to continue protection for the time/mileage frame beyond the original carmaker's warranty.

I prefer zero or very low deductibles for extended warranties and service contracts because unlike collision or comprehensive claims, which tend to deal with a single large-loss event, mechanical and electronic breakages, failures or problems can occur a number of times, particularly later in a vehicle's service life -- precisely the time and mileage framework covered by these warranties and contracts. I'd rather not have to pay $50 or $100 every time I take the vehicle in for even a minor problem.

As always, life is a matter of choices. In this case, you pay your money or you take your chances. There's no right or wrong answer. It's what you're comfortable with.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

New England 2/1/15 5:30 PM
Seattle
Minnesota 94 FINAL
Philadelphia 103
Houston 93 FINAL
Boston 87
Portland 99 FINAL
Atlanta 105
Sacramento 90 FINAL
Cleveland 101
Toronto 127 FINAL
Brooklyn 122
Dallas 93 FINAL
Miami 72
LA Clippers 103 FINAL
New Orleans 108
Golden State 100 FINAL
Utah 110
Chicago 93 FINAL
Phoenix 99
Pittsburgh 2 FINAL(OT)
New Jersey 1
St. Louis 3 FINAL(SO)
Carolina 2
Nashville 0 FINAL
Colorado 3
Buffalo 2 FINAL
Vancouver 5
Chicago 4 FINAL
Anaheim 1
Harvard 75 FINAL
Princeton 72
Quinnipiac 57 FINAL
Canisius 63
Brown 49 FINAL
Cornell 57
Siena 79 FINAL
Manhattan 87
Marist 65 FINAL
Niagara 61
Dartmouth 51 FINAL
Penn 58
Oregon 68 FINAL
Arizona State 67
Yale 63 FINAL
Columbia 59
Monmouth 60 FINAL
Fairfield 59
IUPUI 59 FINAL
Western Ill 63
Oregon State 34 FINAL
Arizona 57
Kent State 55 FINAL
Buffalo 80
Canisius 75 FINAL
Monmouth 58
Butler 67 FINAL
Providence 59
Cornell 65 FINAL
Brown 52
Columbia 47 FINAL
Yale 55
Coll of Charleston 47 FINAL
Drexel 64
Penn 55 FINAL
Dartmouth 39
Elon 60 FINAL
James Madison 89
(19) Princeton 96 FINAL
Harvard 46
(9) Florida State 82 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Quinnipiac 87 FINAL
Siena 62
Richmond 54 FINAL
Rhode Island 50
Loyola-Chicago 58 FINAL
Southern Ill 64
Georgetown 52 FINAL
DePaul 93
Villanova 75 FINAL
Marquette 59
Wichita State 70 FINAL
Northern Iowa 51
Xavier 65 FINAL
Creighton 74
Bradley 58 FINAL
Illinois State 55
Missouri State 89 FINAL
Drake 94
Arizona 48 FINAL
Utah 62
(11) Arizona State 68 FINAL
Colorado 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close