DENVER - The conventional wisdom that Iraq was THE dominant issue of the presidential campaign seem so outdated, replaced by worries about the economy and energy prices.
Yet the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are likely to figure large in speeches tonight, when vice presidential nominee Joe Biden is scheduled to take the convention stage.
And the Iraq war as a political issue now confronts the Democrats with a complex strategic challenge. They must decry President Bush's policy in Iraq with enough fervor to satisfy Democratic delegates who are still more energized by that issue than by any other -- but without seeming too narrowly focused on a subject that is no longer the top worry of most Americans.
Minnesota delegate Miguel Lindgren, of Roseville, said he is worried that Iraq is taking a back seat to the convention's focus on domestic issues.
"I haven't heard much, and it concerns me," Lindgren said. "Obviously, we're getting lost in the hype and the hoopla in the convention talking about issues at home finally, but we need to readdress the war."
Strong words against war
In one of their first orders of business, delegates ratified a party platform that backs Obama's pledge of "complete redeployment within 16 months from Iraq."
And one of the more forceful comments about Iraq at the convention came from Sen. Edward Kennedy on Monday night. "Barack Obama will be a commander in chief who understands that young Americans in uniform must never be committed to a mistake, but always to a mission worthy of their bravery," Kennedy told the crowd.
But even a number of Iraq war veterans running for office, including Marine Ashwin Madia in Minnesota's Third Congressional District, now seem to focus more on domestic issues. At a breakfast with the Minnesota delegation on Tuesday, Madia never mentioned that he was a vet and referred to Iraq only twice.
Another Iraq veteran, retired Navy SEAL Cmdr. Mike Lumpkin, said that when he began his Democratic congressional campaign in his district surrounding San Diego, the two largest issues were securing America's borders and Iraq. Now, he said, the two have been pushed aside by the economy.
"The average American doesn't have ownership in the war in Iraq. The policy has been to go shopping. Health care, the economy was well down on the list. Now the economy is number one," Lumpkin said. "People are worried about the alligator closest to the canoe, and the alligator closest to the canoe to most Americans is the economy."
Almost to symbolize the ambiguity of where Iraq fits into things, at the start of a meeting on veterans' issues in downtown Denver on Tuesday, a man leaped to his feet, announced that he was a Marine and began chanting -- not about the war, but about Obama being a "baby killer." Outside, a war protester wearing a white mask and black shirt held a cardboard sign with the name of a soldier killed in Iraq. Nearby was a protester demanding that people stop eating meat.
Muddying the waters
Recent events in Iraq present a dilemma about what defines victory or defeat, particularly the surge of U.S. troops into Baghdad early last year ordered by President Bush. One group, Vets for Freedom, released a television ad on Tuesday supportive of the surge. The ad, "I am the Surge," is scheduled to begin airing in Denver today and in the Twin Cities next week, as well as in the battleground states of Ohio, Michigan, Virginia and Colorado later in September.
Further muddying the waters is the war record of presumptive Republican nominee John McCain, who spent five years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. While highly critical of McCain's policies on Iraq and on health care for veterans, Dick Klass, a retired U.S. Air Force colonel, Vietnam vet and co-chair of Veterans for Obama-Biden, said the image of McCain is difficult to confront. "Senator McCain is a tough brand," he told a group of Democrats interested in veterans' issues on Tuesday. "When you talk about McCain, you talk about a veteran."
Minnesota Democratic delegate Sam Scott, an Army Reservist and Iraq war vet, is willing to wait a little longer before becoming concerned that Iraq is not being talked about at the convention. On his own, he has had face time with Sens. Jim Webb and John Kerry to talk about veterans health issues. But he knows the clock is ticking. "My dad told me the politicians will forget about you once the war is over," he said. "You've only got so much time to make your case."
Mark Brunswick • 651-222-1636
![]() Buy Foreclosed PropertiesSearch 8500 pre-foreclosure, auction and bank-owned properties in the metro area. Start now!![]() Open positions!A new career awaits. Look through thousands of listings to find your new job. Start now! |
Featured comment
Re: YOU DON'T HAVE TO ASSUME FAILURE IN IRAQ
You still did not say how to pay for the $10 billion per month we are spending in Iraq. Adding it to the deficit means that the money has … read more to come from somewhere else and that somewhere else has been the Federal Reserve, which results in inflation and a weaker dollar. Call it the inflation tax. There is no free lunch. As to "AT LEAST HAVE A CHANCE", your list looks like the same list of talking points from five years ago. Look, I would have loved to have everything work out as the new-con's dreamed. Democracy flowing across the Mid-East, everyone singing kum-by-ya and group hugs for all. But I also knew a little about the history of the mid-east, the ethnic and religious rivalries, the realities that we can't just wish away. Five years and half a Trillion dollars later ($2 trillion when long term replacement/health care are included) we have a surge that has "succeeded" in getting violence down to the 2004 levels that were considered intolerable at the time. Much of the "success" is due to partitioning the country, neighborhood by neighborhood, into walled camps. Much of the "success" is due to re-arming the Sunis, the former Baathist, to prevent them from getting slaughtered by the Shia. If you don't think they will use those weapons for revenge, you have not been paying attention for the last 5,000 years. I don't want to hate George W. Bush, but I hate the way he has intentionally mislead America, has screwed up this country fiscally and economically and militarily. When Bush took over in 2000 all I wanted was a continuation of "Peace and Prosperity" and got neither.
Close comment