On the homepage
Thanksgiving
Out There
Video
Reusse's Turkey
Continued: Big Stone II plant left in limbo after a no-vote by PUC
Print this story
E-mail this story
Save to del.icio.us
Share on Facebook
Share on DiggRelated Content
poll: Do you support building a new coal-fired power plant?
More from www.startribune.com
The four-year debate about the Big Stone II coal-fired power plant was supposed to come to an end Thursday, but its future remains undecided.
After five hours of deliberations, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) decided that it wanted more numbers before deciding whether to approve two power lines from the proposed South Dakota plant into Minnesota.
The move was recommended by Commissioner Dennis O'Brien, as it became clear that he would be the swing vote.
Chairman LeRoy Koppendrayer and David Boyd had expressed their intent to approve the lines, and Thomas Pugh and Phyllis Reha had indicated that they would not.
The commissioners' next step is to hear cost projections from an independent expert, although they did not decide when or how.
O'Brien said he was frustrated by the dueling cost models offered in testimony by the two sides: five regional power companies led by Otter Tail Power, which want permission to build the lines to their Minnesota customers; and five environmental groups, which oppose them based largely on the proposed plant's emissions of carbon dioxide -- a leading cause of global warming.
The cost projections in the models matter, because Minnesota law says the power companies must demonstrate that coal is a cheaper way to meet their energy needs than are either conservation or renewable energy sources. The developers have said that, without the transmission lines into Minnesota, they might scrub Big Stone II altogether.
The delayed vote introduced new concerns. Todd Guerrero, an attorney for the power companies, said that they hope the commission can make a decision by September, when regulatory actions in other states should be finished. Koppendrayer, who vacates his chairman position at the end of this month, said he is worried that more delay could kill the project.
Janette Brimmer, an attorney for the environmental groups, said the board's reluctance to make a decision proves that the project developers have not met their burden of proof.
Koppendrayer and Boyd opposed the delay. O'Brien, Pugh and Reha voted for it.
H.J. Cummins • 612-673-4671
Previous pageRecent www.startribune.com stories
- Voters saw flight risk, so comeuppance was expedited
- State trooper escapes injury when squad is hit by drunken driver
- Wanted: Front bumper, trunk gasket - and prayers
- Sid Hartman: Favre's play boosts Vikes' stadium plans
- Ponzi scheme suspect liked cars -- and his submarine
- Favre keeps playing, records keep falling
- SUV crashes avoiding deer; Edina woman badly hurt
- At issue: Two women, money and Hecker
- Couple slips though security to crash state dinner
- Winfield says he'll play against Bears
  Free Jobs E-mail NewsletterResources to help further your career. Sign up now. Find Your Next HomeSearch realtor represented & for sale by owner homes in the Twin Cities. Plus, find open house listings. |
Featured comment
Coal Fired Power
China and India are planning on putting one Big Stone style coal plant per week online in the near future as part of their long term goald … read more for reliable and cost effective electricity productin, all built with NO pollution or carbon control At All. We continue to go down a suicidal path or following "science" that at best is wildly overstated, Meanwhile we will spend ourselves into oblivion, and the pollution and carbon you all fear will be INCREASED because our competition is much less efficient or concerned about Any of this, Well.good luck to all of us if we don't wake up soon.
Close comment